Errors, stages, methods, and peer review are some of the topics that will be discussed
Errors
in science
Science
conclusions are potentially falsifiable according to some philosophers of
science. Observations lead to hypotheses
that help explain some aspect of causality relating to the observations. Additional observations to increase the
sample size may further clarify the need for modification of the
hypothesis. Experimentation may also be
used to determine additional aspects of factors determining the results
observed. Once hypotheses are supported
by sufficient observations and/or results of experimentation, they are accepted
as theories. The process carried to an
extreme with the theory not being refuted can result in the theory being
accepted as a law. Alternatively, there
can be opposing theories explaining the same question.
An
example of the last statement is the theories explaining the origin of the
moon (Wikipedia, moon). The most popular theory for some
years has been the moon resulting from a major object of appropriate size
striking the earth at a very specific angle and speed. The probability of such a precise event is
very low according to its proponents.
Similarity of moon rocks and earth are thought to support the theory.
An
alternative is the accretion theory. It
suggests the moon started as a smaller mass trapped in our orbit and then grew
by asteroids, meteorites, and other space debris impacting on the moon. Since the earth would also receive many of
the same types of accreting objects, the theory also explains the similarity of
earth and moon and any other heavenly body enjoying similar composition of
rocks. The objects would also hit the
moon at random places thus having net zero rotation mass added to the moon and
thus help explain the moon always keeping the same hemisphere toward the earth.
The
earth’s larger initial mass would keep it from slowing its rotation at the same
rate the moon did even though the earth received much more accreted mass. If the asteroids began as a collision of one
or more major planets between Mars and Jupiter, a large portion of the debris
would likely have reached into our orbit and been a source of accreting
materials for both moon and earth. At
least one study has suggested that impacts of asteroids or other similar
objects were much more frequent than today during one pre-Cambrian period. The sum of such evidence seems to make the
accretion theory of much higher probability than the low probability theory of
the moon originating from an earth strike.
The chance of one or more smaller objects striking earth a glancing blow
and adding additional accreting fragments to the mass of the moon would seem to
be of intermediate probability.
Stages of science
Naming phase; structure-parts-features;
their functions; principles and interactions
The
naming phase of science was particularly important in the development of
biology due to the many kinds of organisms.
It is important in all aspects of science and knowledge so that when we
communicate we can know when we are talking about the same thing. Our ability to group things by similarity on
different levels contributes to the further growth of science. The things with greater similarity can be
clustered according to features in common and observation of such groups
results in naming structures, parts, and other features of the object and/or
group named. This first, or alpha, phase
of biology is the naming phase and is called taxonomy. Taxonomy is often referred to as systematics
when it includes more comprehensive information. The name given the organism needs basic
description adequate to differentiate it from other named organisms.
Once
organisms are named, the second phase, a more detailed investigation of
structure can follow. Anatomy and
morphology are both the study of structure.
Anatomy is more concerned with the relationship of the various parts of
an organism while morphology is more concerned with the details of shape.
The
third phase investigates the functions of the parts and/or the whole and in
biology is called physiology. In
medicine, specialists often are designated by the region of the body or the
system they deal with. Specialization
goes to extremes in dealing with some systems. Ophthalmologists, audiologists,
and dentists have one end to work on while proctologists, gynecologists, and
urologists have another.
The
fourth phase could be split in to many, one for each of some study of
principles, relationships, or interactions involving more than the individual
or object of study. Ecology, genetics,
and evolution are in this phase. The
findings of principles from this phase can be of value in advanced studies of
earlier phases.
No comments:
Post a Comment