Evolution and Pharmaceuticals
During the course of the evolution of life on earth, species
were faced with many challenges. Over
time, a mold tailored a chemical to a point where it prevented bacteria from interfering
with its growth. Alexander Fleming noted
that inhibition of bacterial colonies on a petri dish around a fungus that
contaminated the culture. The happy
accident and his observation of the effect of penicillin led to many searches
for other fungi that might be producing other antibiotics.
We have a more versatile bacteriafighting method in our
immune system. It can even fight against
toxins, given the right circumstances.
We can induce other mammals to produce antivenoms in their serum to
combat potentially lethal snakebites when injected after a bite. Are there other marvels of nature waiting to
be discovered by our pharmaceutical industry?
Groups, especially sponges, that are attached to the sea
sediments or rocks, have an evolutionary history of over half a billion
years. Their major defense against
microorganisms such as bacteria may include physical barriers, such as mucus
secretion, but there has been a wide assortment of toxic materials, some of which
provide protection against predators and others probably against
microorganisms. It seems such knowledge
could provide a wealth of useful products.
I think the major thrust has been to look for anticancer activity in
such products.
EVOLUTION: CONTROL OF SPEED AND DIRECTION
Control or lack thereof
The hereditary changes determining the speed and
direction of evolution are not subject to control nor are they controlled by
some foreseen outcome of the process of natural selection. Many possible random events producing changes
in the DNA produce a range of possible variations in individuals. The survival value may be valuable in one
habitat, but detrimental in another.
When the habitats occur in different parts of the range, the one species
may become two or more species as accumulations of differences become great
enough that the extremes can no longer interbreed successfully with each other.
The survival or
death of a variant may be due to chance meeting with a predator. A falling rock may select traits by
eliminating those of individuals too slow to see and escape, but its selective
action would be random for traits not involving sensing its approach and
facilitating rapid evasion.
In the billion years animals have existed, and the millions of species present now and during many of those billion years, there have been uncountable selective events resulting in compounds useful for survival, and far greater numbers of events that were useless or harmful. But the harmful ones reduce the chances of their bearers surviving. The result - many millions of possible useful substances still to be discovered are out there in nature.
Speed of evolutionary change
Early in the evolutionary lineage of groups of related
organisms change was probably quite rapid as compared to groups that have not
radiated into all available habitats.
Well adapted species may change very little. This is evident in the fossil record. One of the more astounding ones is Lingula, a brachiopod living today,
whose shell is much the same, except for size, as a Pre-Cambrian fossil
brachiopod shell.
The speed of evolution of things affecting survival
can be quite rapid when there are great differences in survival value
involved. Most fish are well streamlined,
so little drag enables easy progress through the water. Birds are also streamlined, but their
streamlining is of most value at high air speeds. Natural selection maintains the streamlining
for both fish and birds.
Direction of evolutionary change
Different species of the same group may be evolving in
different directions. For example, most
mammalian groups, such as rodents, carnivores, and primates have radiated into
different sizes. Those particular
examples have mostly started from relatively small ancestors. But several vertebrate groups show the
largest species are only known from fossils.
Direction is not typically linear.
The long ancestral line from early life to us and most higher animals
went through a regression from annelids to the pogonophorans before advancing
to the groups leading to the vertebrates.
The genetic basis of the above
Most inherited characteristics of animals are
multifactorial, that is multiple locations on the DNA may affect the expression
of the characteristic. Some may have one
locus that may have an all or none effect on the expression of a
characteristic. Other characteristics
may have more complicated inheritance.
All aspects of a species are subject to evolution; besides physical and
physiological features, life style, life cycle, and other features evolve,
sometimes independently, but often in conjunction with other features. Improvement in one aspect of our physiology can have far reaching effects in many systems. Conversely, diseases are often characterized by many symptoms.
Sickle cell
anemia is an example where the substitution for one particular amino acid in a
long hemoglobin chain modifies the structure of the hemoglobin molecule. Heterozygous individuals have less expression
of the gene into the fibrous form, but their red cells have enough to provide
protection against growth of malaria parasites.
So natural selection maintains the disease in areas where malaria kills
many without the gene, and the disease kills many homozygous for the gene (i.e.,
inheriting it from both parents). But in
areas where malaria is not present, the frequency of the gene is expected to
diminish due to higher mortality of those with the disease.
Environmental control of gene expression
One of the examples of environmental control are the
two color-phases of animals in arctic and subarctic locations. In summer, several species of mammals and
birds have fur or feathers of darker colors than the white shown in the
winter. It is protective coloration for
prey species with the seasonal change, as well as enabling predators to have
greater success in getting closer to prey before they are alarmed. Apparently, the colder temperatures prevent
expression of the pigmentation genes.
I suspect my white hair is a result of lower activity
resulting in skin temperature needed to make the melanin for my long-gone
youthful dark hair; the benefit is many young people holding the door for me.
EVOLUTION AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES
Quasi-genetic control of gene expression
The existence of introns and exons suggest a possible
mechanism of graded responses of genes since so much of the DNA is not serving
as a template for RNA producing the physiological and/or structural biochemical
actions of the genome. Think how the
length of the “inactive” space between genes may moderate or accelerate
reaction to an adjacent promoter or inhibitor gene.
The enzymes acting are usually proteins with an active
site held in appropriate form by seemingly inactive parts of the molecule. The inactive parts have parts that can
undergo substitutions of minor portions that may not have much effect on
action. Hormones may have similar
flexibility.
Drug manufacturers take advantage of such flexibility
to produce new versions of medications that can then be patented to replace the
original that is going off patent. Some
molecules receiving such modification may have changed effectiveness in
unpredictable fashion with no change, bad changes, or good changes. Toxicity, solubility, and other factors make
it nearly as big a screening problem with pre-clinical and clinical testing
before marketing. But the economics of
keeping it on patent and high priced is important to them and makes it
profitable.
Designer drugs
Physical chemistry and computers have become capable
of visualizing three dimensional structures of molecules. Knowing the structure of some significant
portion of a bio-molecule makes it simpler to design chemical molecules that
will bind to the site and bring desired structure to the rest of the
molecule. There seems to be no end to
the possible applications. I doubt that
the computer will be able to do all the thinking and evaluation that a
competent research team can bring to complement the task.
PERSONAL PEEVES
A great drug company, The Upjohn Corporation, was
started by a local physician who developed the friable pill. They were an excellent employer and blessing
to the community. Several mergers later,
they are now Pfizer. Along the way research
teams were disbanded in downsizing the merged research effort. The emphasis is now on buying up small
innovative companies to stock their new-drug pipeline. I don’t know of any successes of the
computer-driven drug designing, although I am sure it has yielded some benefits
at the cost of losing possible greater benefits from the old research teams.
Now and then there are hints of and actual spin-offs
of businesses. The drug company business
types and corporate boards can now reward themselves outrageously like many
other businesses do. Shareholders,
employees, and communities suffer with the shenanigans. Short term rewards imperil future
benefits. The vast majority of executives
are honorable and hard-working, but one persuasive senior executive can do a
lot of damage in their grasp for material success. Make a big deal of the
mergers or downsizings achieved and get a big bonus in dollars or shares at
everyone else’s expense. Pfizer is still
a good company.
Joseph G. Engemann Emeritus Professor of Biology, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo
December 9, 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment